I am perplexed by Brexiteers.
The bulk of their public statements are an entirely irrational combination of “Project Fantasy” with the back up of “Project Shutup” when the fantasy is revealed. Trade deals, for example, take a long time to negotiate and US would be negligent in looking after the interests of its own people were it to de-emphasise its trade deal with the EU in order to pursue one with a newly Brexited UK. “We’ll do a trade deal with the US” is Project Fantasy. When the President of the United States pointed that out the Brexiteers moved to Project Shutup.
The bulk of their public statements are an entirely irrational combination of “Project Fantasy” with the back up of “Project Shutup” when the fantasy is revealed. Trade deals, for example, take a long time to negotiate and US would be negligent in looking after the interests of its own people were it to de-emphasise its trade deal with the EU in order to pursue one with a newly Brexited UK. “We’ll do a trade deal with the US” is Project Fantasy. When the President of the United States pointed that out the Brexiteers moved to Project Shutup.
The IMF (foreigners who should stay out if it), the CBI (little
more than an EU pressure group), the Treasury (government propaganda) and the
OECD (more foreigners) are just a few of those saying that the British people
would be much worse off under a Brexit. Meanwhile
Kate Hoey, a leading Brexit campaigner cannot give one example of a report showing Britain’s would be better off under
a Brexit.
But still there is the claim that the British people will be better off. Or, at least, not worse off. Or at least not very much worse off.
But still there is the claim that the British people will be better off. Or, at least, not worse off. Or at least not very much worse off.
And anyone who say different is biased. Or in the pay of the EU. Or scaremongering. Or interfering. Or...just shut up ok!
No comments:
Post a Comment